3rd Workshop on Planning in the Era of LLMs (LM4Plan @ ICAPS 2026)

Update: Invited talk slides and recording are now available!

Visit https://llmforplanning.github.io/ for up-to-date information. The workshop will take place on June 29, 2026.

Overview

Language Models (LMs) are a disruptive force, changing how research was done in many subareas of AI. Planning is one of the last bastions that remain standing. The focus of this workshop is on the questions in the intersection of these areas. Some of the specific areas we would like to gain a better understanding in include: what LMs can contribute to planning, how LMs can/should be used, what the pitfalls of using LMs are and what guarantees can be obtained.

Topics of Interest

We invite paper submissions on the following (not exhaustive) list of topics:

  • Planning directly with pre-trained or fine-tuned LMs.
  • Planning for LMs.
  • LMs for (partial) model elicitation.
  • LMs for generating structured planning problem descriptions.
  • LMs for search guidance or search pruning.
  • LMs for validation and verification of plans, policies, or models.
  • LMs for generalization in planning and generalized planning.
  • Using LMs as a proxy for user preferences.
  • Using LMs to develop interfaces for planning-based systems or planning-related problems.
  • Other applications of LMs in planning.

We particularly encourage submissions leveraging small and open-weight language models, especially those advancing efficient and reliable methods with rigorous, reproducible evaluations and accessible research artifacts.

Important Dates

  • Paper submission deadline: May 1st, 2026, AoE May 8, 2026, AoE
  • Paper acceptance notification: June 2nd, 2026, AoE
  • Workshop: June 29, 2026

ICAPS will be in-person this year. Authors of accepted workshop papers are expected to register for the workshop, physically attend the conference and present in person. All accepted papers will have an oral presentation.

Submission Details

We solicit workshop paper submissions relevant to the above call. Paper submissions should be made through OpenReview.

Format

All submissions must be a single PDF file and follow one of the formats below:

  • Long papers – up to 8 pages + unlimited references / appendices
  • Short papers – up to 4 pages + unlimited references / appendices

Style

Please format submissions in AAAI style (see instructions in the Author Kit ).

Dual-submission and non-archival policy

Authors submitting papers rejected from other conferences, please ensure you do your utmost to address the comments given by the reviewers. Please do not submit papers that are already accepted for the main ICAPS conference to the workshop. The workshop is a non-archival venue and will not have official proceedings. Workshop submissions can be subsequently or concurrently submitted to other venues.

Double-blind Reviewing policy

All submissions must be anonymized and may not contain any identifying information that may violate the double-blind reviewing policy. Submissions and reviews will not be public. Only accepted papers will be made public.

Invited Talk

LLMs don’t even need to plan — they can build planners

Jendrik Seipp

Jendrik Seipp, Linköping University

📄 Slides  ·  ▶️ Watch the talk

Abstract

For years, LLMs couldn’t reliably solve even the smallest planning tasks. That has changed: we recently showed that the latest frontier models now beat even the strongest classical planners on several benchmark domains. Using an LLM as the planner is still rarely the best choice. Having it build planner components instead is faster, cheaper, and far less energy-hungry. I show how to do this while keeping the guarantees that make classical planning worth using, like optimality and bounded runtime. And it doesn’t stop at planners. Agents can now carry out research largely on their own, and I’ll close with some thoughts on what that means for how we work as researchers.

Speaker Bio

Jendrik Seipp is a Senior Associate Professor in Artificial Intelligence at Linköping University, Sweden, where he directs the Machine Reasoning Lab within the AIICS division. His research focuses on AI planning and its connections to machine learning. He earned his MSc in computer science from the University of Freiburg, Germany (2012) and his PhD from the University of Basel, Switzerland (2018), where he then worked as a postdoctoral researcher until 2020. He joined Linköping University as an assistant professor in 2021 and was promoted to senior associate professor in 2024. His work is supported by WASP, a Swedish Research Council Starting Grant, a Wallenberg Academy Fellowship, and an SSF Future Research Leaders grant.

Schedule

Morning

Session 19:00-10:20

9:00 — Opening remarks

TimePaperAuthorsLen
9:05Semantic Partial Grounding via LLMsGiuseppe Canonaco, Alberto Pozanco, Daniel Borrajo15
9:20Benchmarking LLM Pipelines for Natural Language to Automated Planning ModelsMarcus Tantakoun, Christian Muise, Xiaodan Zhu15
9:35Grounded Evaluation and Repair for NL-to-PDDL Problem GenerationJoana Rosa, Bruno Martins, L. Miguel Silveira, Pedro Ricardo Leitão dos Santos15
9:50Towards LLM-Driven Synthesis of Narrative Planning ModelsAllix Fletcher, Christian Muise15
10:05A Natural Language Copilot for Interactive Plan Space ExplorationPaul Horn, Daniel Gnad15
Coffee break - 10:30-10:50
Session 210:50-12:20
TimePaperAuthorsLen
10:50FABLE: A Novel Data-Flow Analysis Benchmark on Procedural Text for Large Language Model EvaluationVishal Pallagani, Nitin Gupta, John A. Aydin, Biplav Srivastava15
11:05ALPSBench: Can Large Language Models Reason Their Way Through Planning Formalisms?Marcus Tantakoun, Christian Muise, Xiaodan Zhu15
11:20On the Ability of Transformers to Verify PlansYash Sarrof, Yupei Du, Katharina Stein, Alexander Koller, Sylvie Thiebaux, Michael Hahn15
11:35Toward a General Framework for Evaluating Per-Domain Generalization Using LLMs, Theorem Provers, and Statistical Model CheckingNicola J. Müller, Naya Rudolph, Ayal Taitler, Timo P. Gros15
11:50Integrating the Unified Planning Framework via MCP with Large Language Models for Reliable Automated PlanningJoão Areias Saraiva, Thomas Kirste15
12:05Learning HTNs from Visual Demonstration with Vision-Language Models: Preliminary ResultsNgoc La, Karthik Mahadevan, Pulkit Verma, Julie Shah15
Lunch break - 12:30-14:00

Afternoon

Session 314:00-15:15
TimePaperAuthorsLen
14:00LLM-Evolved Domain-Independent Heuristics for Symbolic AI PlanningElliot Gestrin, Jendrik Seipp15
14:15Personalized Medication Planning via Direct Domain Modeling and LLM-Generated HeuristicsYonatan Vernik, David Izhaki, Alexander Tuisov, Hana Weitman, Alexander Shleyfman, Gal Kaminka15
14:30Learning and Reusing Policy Decompositions for Hierarchical Generalized Planning with LLM AgentsShirin Sohrabi, Haritha Ananthakrishnan, Harsha Kokel, Kavitha Srinivas, Michael Katz15
14:45Think Hierarchically, Act Optimally: Decoupled Hierarchical Planning and Execution for LLM AgentsVikas Kumar, Jyotsana Khatri, Shirish Karande15
15:00The Curious Case of Planning for Unreliable Agents: Challenges and Opportunities in Orchestrating Generative AI AgentsRoya Daneshi, Sunandita Patra, Kshama Dwarakanath, Sriram Gopalakrishnan, Daniel Borrajo, Sarath Sreedharan15
Coffee break - 15:30-15:50
Session 415:50-17:30
TimePaperAuthorsLen
15:50Invited talk: LLMs don’t even need to plan — they can build planners (video)Jendrik Seipp50
16:40Panel discussion and closing remarks50

Talk length is shown in the last column in minutes. Paper talks are 10 min presentation + 5 min Q&A.

Accepted Papers

  • Semantic Partial Grounding via LLMs
    Giuseppe Canonaco, Alberto Pozanco, Daniel Borrajo
  • FABLE: A Novel Data-Flow Analysis Benchmark on Procedural Text for Large Language Model Evaluation
    Vishal Pallagani, Nitin Gupta, John A. Aydin, Biplav Srivastava
  • ALPSBench: Can Large Language Models Reason Their Way Through Planning Formalisms?
    Marcus Tantakoun, Christian Muise, Xiaodan Zhu
  • Benchmarking LLM Pipelines for Natural Language to Automated Planning Models
    Marcus Tantakoun, Christian Muise, Xiaodan Zhu
  • Learning HTNs from Visual Demonstration with Vision-Language Models: Preliminary Results
    Ngoc La, Karthik Mahadevan, Pulkit Verma, Julie Shah
  • Integrating the Unified Planning Framework via MCP with Large Language Models for Reliable Automated Planning
    João Areias Saraiva, Thomas Kirste
  • LLM-Evolved Domain-Independent Heuristics for Symbolic AI Planning
    Elliot Gestrin, Jendrik Seipp
  • On the Ability of Transformers to Verify Plans
    Yash Sarrof, Yupei Du, Katharina Stein, Alexander Koller, Sylvie Thiebaux, Michael Hahn
  • Learning and Reusing Policy Decompositions for Hierarchical Generalized Planning with LLM Agents
    Shirin Sohrabi, Haritha Ananthakrishnan, Harsha Kokel, Kavitha Srinivas, Michael Katz
  • Toward a General Framework for Evaluating Per-Domain Generalization Using LLMs, Theorem Provers, and Statistical Model Checking
    Nicola J. Müller, Naya Rudolph, Ayal Taitler, Timo P. Gros
  • The Curious Case of Planning for Unreliable Agents: Challenges and Opportunities in Orchestrating Generative AI Agents
    Roya Daneshi, Sunandita Patra, Kshama Dwarakanath, Sriram Gopalakrishnan, Daniel Borrajo, Sarath Sreedharan
  • Personalized Medication Planning via Direct Domain Modeling and LLM-Generated Heuristics
    Yonatan Vernik, David Izhaki, Alexander Tuisov, Hana Weitman, Alexander Shleyfman, Gal Kaminka
  • Towards LLM-Driven Synthesis of Narrative Planning Models
    Allix Fletcher, Christian Muise
  • Think Hierarchically, Act Optimally: Decoupled Hierarchical Planning and Execution for LLM Agents
    Vikas Kumar, Jyotsana Khatri, Shirish Karande
  • A Natural Language Copilot for Interactive Plan Space Exploration
    Paul Horn, Daniel Gnad
  • Grounded Evaluation and Repair for NL-to-PDDL Problem Generation
    Joana Rosa, Bruno Martins, L. Miguel Silveira, Pedro Ricardo Leitão dos Santos

Organizing Committee

  • Augusto B. Corrêa, University of Oxford
  • Elliot Gestrin, Linköping University
  • Michael Katz, IBM
  • Nir Lipovetzky, University of Melbourne
  • Luckeciano C. Melo, University of Oxford
  • Sarath Sreedharan, Colorado State University
  • Katharina Stein, Saarland University

Please send your inquiries to llmforplanning@gmail.com